The impact of semi-continuous and alternating microbial feeding patterns on methane yield from UASB reactors

Feeding strategy represents one of the most important bioreactor operation parameters, however, how different feeding patterns impact reactor microbiome development and treatment performance in up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors has not been systematically investigated. In the present study, three feeding strategies, including continuous feeding, semi-continuous feeding (with starvation-feast cycles), and alternate feeding (with high loading-low loading cycles) were assessed and compared using three laboratory-scale UASB reactors. It was observed that both long and short starvation-feast cycles provided by a semi-continuous feeding strategy failed to sustain stable anaerobic digestion under the conditions examined in the present study, while alternate feeding with high and low loading cycles supported microbial development. This feeding pattern resulted in an average methane yield of 74 & PLUSMN; 8.5% and an effluent COD removal efficiency of 89 & PLUSMN; 2.8%, which is comparable to the reactor operated under a continuous feeding pattern (Methane yield of 72 & PLUSMN; 2.4% and a COD removal efficiency of 87 & PLUSMN; 7.7%). Interestingly, as compared to continuous operation, reactors experienced starvation/feast stress (i.e., semi-continuous feeding) developed significantly higher methanogenic activities once continuous feeding was presumed, with dominant methanogens shifted from Methanosaeta in continuous feeding UASB to Methanosarcina in reactors undergone semi-continuous feeding. It was concluded that reactor feeding strategies can significantly impact microbiome communities in UASB, and an alternate feeding pattern is preferred, as compared to semi-continuous operation when reactor feeding cannot be continuously supplied.

Automated summary

This study compared three different feeding strategies (continuous feeding, semi-continuous feeding, and alternate feeding) in UASB reactors and found that alternate feeding supported microbial development and had higher methane yield and COD removal efficiency compared to semi-continuous feeding.