4.4 Article

A Degron Blocking Strategy Towards Improved CRL4CRBN Recruiting PROTAC Selectivity

Journal

CHEMBIOCHEM
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.202300351

Keywords

Cereblon; IMiDs; Neo-substrates; PROTACs; Targeted protein degradation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study addresses the challenge of selectivity in PROTACs by leveraging structural insights from known CRL4(CRBN) molecular glue degraders, and demonstrates improved selectivity by using computational modeling. The tools and principles presented in this work are valuable for the development of targeted protein degradation.
Small molecules inducing protein degradation are important pharmacological tools to interrogate complex biology and are rapidly translating into clinical agents. However, to fully realise the potential of these molecules, selectivity remains a limiting challenge. Herein, we addressed the issue of selectivity in the design of CRL4(CRBN) recruiting PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras (PROTACs). Thalidomide derivatives used to generate CRL4(CRBN) recruiting PROTACs have well described intrinsic monovalent degradation profiles by inducing the recruitment of neo-substrates, such as GSPT1, Ikaros and Aiolos. We leveraged structural insights from known CRL4(CRBN) neo-substrates to attenuate and indeed remove this monovalent degradation function in well-known CRL4(CRBN) molecular glues degraders, namely CC-885 and Pomalidomide. We then applied these design principles on a previously published BRD9 PROTAC (dBRD9-A) and generated an analogue with improved selectivity profile. Finally, we implemented a computational modelling pipeline to show that our degron blocking design does not impact PROTAC-induced ternary complex formation. We believe that the tools and principles presented in this work will be valuable to support the development of targeted protein degradation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available