4.0 Article

Experimental Designs for Tortoise Pacing Diversion Structures and Tortoise Guards Along Highway Barriers

Journal

CHELONIAN CONSERVATION AND BIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 39-45

Publisher

ALLEN PRESS INC
DOI: 10.2744/CCB-1534.1

Keywords

Mojave Desert Tortoise; Gopherus agassizii; deflection barriers; mortality; endangered species; tortoise conservation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a study to reduce Mojave Desert Tortoise mortality along roadways, researchers tested the feasibility of structures that deter tortoises from walking along barriers or crossing areas with gates or openings. The diversion designs tested were somewhat successful in deflecting tortoises away from fences, but some tortoises still opted to continue walking along barriers. The "tortoise guard" structures, similar to cattle guards, were not completely effective in preventing tortoises from crossing openings, but certain characteristics such as gap sizes and a climbable design were identified as important for an effective structure.
In a study to reduce Mojave Desert Tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) mortality along roadways, we tested the feasibility of structures that discourage tortoises from 1) walking or ''pacing'' along barriers or 2) crossing areas where gates or openings occur. The diversion designs we tested (one straight and one curved structure, each 7.6 m long) deflected tortoises away from fences at nearly the same rate as tortoises who continued walking along barriers despite the diversion (36.8% vs. 35.7%). No ''tortoise guard'' structures that we tested, similar to cattle guard structures, were 100% effective at preventing tortoises from crossing the opening. We identified essential characteristics of an effective ''tortoise guard'' such as minimum gap sizes in the structure and a construction design that allowed a tortoise to climb out of a trench under the structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available