4.3 Article

Financial hardship differences by LGBTQ plus status among assigned female at birth adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: a mixed methods analysis

Journal

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01740-9

Keywords

Adolescent and young adult; Financial hardship; Financial burden; Financial toxicity; LGBTQ plus; Sexual and gender minority; SGM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the financial hardship experienced by LGBTQ+ adolescents and young adult cancer survivors. The results reveal that LGBTQ+ individuals have a higher probability of experiencing material and psychological financial hardship compared to non-LGBTQ+ individuals. Qualitative analysis further highlights the specific economic challenges faced by LGBTQ+ individuals, including educational changes, unpaid bills and debt, and housing instability.
BackgroundAdolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors are at an elevated risk of financial hardship. However, financial hardship among LGBTQ+ AYAs has not been widely explored. Thus, we used qualitative and quantitative survey data from the Horizon Study cohort to assess financial hardship of AYAs by LGBTQ+ status.MethodsMultivariable logit models, predicted probabilities, average marginal effects or differences in predicted probabilities (AME) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the association of LGBTQ+ status and two components of financial hardship: material and psychological. Qualitative content analysis of an open-ended survey question about financial sacrifices was used to describe the third component of financial hardship, behavioral.ResultsAmong 1,635 participants, 4.3% self-identified as LGBTQ+. Multivariable logit models controlling for demographic factors revealed that LGBTQ+ AYAs had an 18-percentage point higher probability of experiencing material financial hardship (95%CI 6-30%) and a 14-percentage point higher probability of experiencing psychological financial hardship (95%CI 2-26%) than non-LGBTQ+ AYAs. Controlling for economic factors attenuated the association of LGBTQ+ status with psychological financial hardship (AME = 11%; 95%CI - 1-23%), while the material financial hardship association remained statistically significant (AME = 14%; 95%CI 3-25%). In the qualitative analysis, LGBTQ+ AYAs frequently reported educational changes and costs (e.g., quitting school), unpaid bills and debt (e.g., medical debt, taking on credit card debt), as well as changes in housing and poor housing conditions (e.g., moving into less expensive house).ConclusionsLGBTQ + targeted and tailored interventions are needed to move toward equity for LGBTQ+ AYAs-an overlooked minority population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available