4.7 Article

Generation of weather data for the assessment of building performances under future heatwave conditions

Journal

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 242, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110491

Keywords

Heatwaves; Climate change; Building simulations; Weather data

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a methodology for producing a minimum set of heatwave weather files that can represent the diversity of expected heatwaves in a specific location. The methodology involves collecting weather projections, identifying heatwaves, constructing a list of indicators, and selecting representative samples of heatwaves. The methodology was tested for Lyon-Saint Exupery Airport, resulting in the identification of 2229 heatwaves within 1260 years of weather projections. The reduced set of 8 representative heatwave weather files can be used for assessing building performance.
Heatwave weather files are needed to assess building performance under future heatwaves. This paper presents a methodology for producing a minimum set of heatwave weather files, which should be representative of the diversity of heatwaves expected in a location of interest. It is a four-step methodology. Weather projections are first collected from the CORDEX project database. Then, heatwaves are identified in the weather data. A list of independent and significant indicators is constructed to characterise the heatwaves. Samples of heatwaves are finally selected based on the list of indicators. The methodology was tested for the location of the Lyon-Saint Exupery Airport. A total of 2229 heatwaves were identified within 1260 years of weather projections. The heatwaves showed a high degree of diversity in terms of weather characteristics. The sampling process selected only 8 representative heatwaves. This number is sufficiently reduced to consider using the reduced set of heatwave weather files for assessing building performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available