Journal
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjo-2023-323297
Keywords
Cornea; Dystrophy; Imaging; Pathology; Physiology
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigated the interest of using chromatic confocal microscopy (CCM) to characterize guttae in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). The results showed that CCM can be an innovative approach to describe and quantify different morphologies of guttae, which could be useful for analyzing different stages of FECD and defining subgroups of patients.
Aim To investigate the interest of chromatic confocal microscopy (CCM) to characterise guttae in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). Methods Descemet's membranes (DM) were obtained during endothelial keratoplasty in patients with FECD and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK). They were compared with healthy samples obtained from body donation to science. Samples were fixed in 0.5% paraformaldehyde and flat mounted. Surface roughness of DMs was quantified using CCM and the AltiMap software that provided the maximum peak (S p) and valley (S v) heights, the mean square roughness (R-q) and the asymmetry coefficient (S-sk). Results The physiological roughness of healthy samples was characterised by an R-q of 0.12 +/- 0.05 mu m, which was two times rougher than in PBK (R-q=0.06 +/- 0.03 mu m), but both were still flat with a symmetrical distribution between peaks and valleys (S-sk close to 0, n(peaks)=n(valleys)), smaller than 1 mu m. In FECD, the maximum peak height was 5.10 +/- 2.40 mu m, up to 5.8 and 8.3 times higher than the control and PBK, respectively. The maximum valley depth was half than the peak (2.28 +/- 0.89 mu m). The surface with guttae was very rough (R q=0.45 +/- 0.14 mu m) and the S-sk=1.84 +/- 0.43 mu m, greater than 0, confirms an asymmetric surface with high peaks and low valleys (n(peaks)>n(valleys)). Moreover, the CCM provided quantitative parameters allowing to distinguish different types of guttae from different patients. Conclusions CCM is an innovative approach to describe and quantify different morphologies of guttae. It could be useful to analyse the different stages of FECD and define subgroups of patients.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available