4.6 Article

Nanotopography by chromatic confocal microscopy of the endothelium in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy and healthy corneas

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjo-2023-323297

Keywords

Cornea; Dystrophy; Imaging; Pathology; Physiology

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the interest of using chromatic confocal microscopy (CCM) to characterize guttae in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). The results showed that CCM can be an innovative approach to describe and quantify different morphologies of guttae, which could be useful for analyzing different stages of FECD and defining subgroups of patients.
Aim To investigate the interest of chromatic confocal microscopy (CCM) to characterise guttae in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). Methods Descemet's membranes (DM) were obtained during endothelial keratoplasty in patients with FECD and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK). They were compared with healthy samples obtained from body donation to science. Samples were fixed in 0.5% paraformaldehyde and flat mounted. Surface roughness of DMs was quantified using CCM and the AltiMap software that provided the maximum peak (S p) and valley (S v) heights, the mean square roughness (R-q) and the asymmetry coefficient (S-sk). Results The physiological roughness of healthy samples was characterised by an R-q of 0.12 +/- 0.05 mu m, which was two times rougher than in PBK (R-q=0.06 +/- 0.03 mu m), but both were still flat with a symmetrical distribution between peaks and valleys (S-sk close to 0, n(peaks)=n(valleys)), smaller than 1 mu m. In FECD, the maximum peak height was 5.10 +/- 2.40 mu m, up to 5.8 and 8.3 times higher than the control and PBK, respectively. The maximum valley depth was half than the peak (2.28 +/- 0.89 mu m). The surface with guttae was very rough (R q=0.45 +/- 0.14 mu m) and the S-sk=1.84 +/- 0.43 mu m, greater than 0, confirms an asymmetric surface with high peaks and low valleys (n(peaks)>n(valleys)). Moreover, the CCM provided quantitative parameters allowing to distinguish different types of guttae from different patients. Conclusions CCM is an innovative approach to describe and quantify different morphologies of guttae. It could be useful to analyse the different stages of FECD and define subgroups of patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available