4.6 Review

Complement in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): The role of complement in refractory ITP

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 203, Issue 1, Pages 96-100

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19070

Keywords

complement; immune thrombocytopenia; low platelets

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a disorder characterized by low platelets due to increased clearance and decreased platelet production. The interaction between platelet autoantibodies and the complement system plays an important role in ITP. A recent clinical trial has shown the efficacy of complement inhibitors in refractory ITP patients.
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a disorder characterized by low platelets due to increased clearance and decreased platelet production. While ITP has been characterized as an acquired disorder of the adaptive immune system, the resulting platelet autoantibodies provide ancillary links to the innate immune system via antibody interaction with the complement system. Most autoantibodies in patients with ITP are of the IgG1 subclass, which can be potent activators of the classical complement pathway. Antibody-coated platelets can initiate complement activation via the classical pathway leading to both direct platelet destruction and enhanced clearance of C3b-coated platelets by complement receptors. Similar autoantibody interactions with bone marrow megakaryocytes can also result in complement injury and ineffective thrombopoiesis. The development of novel therapeutic complement inhibitors has revived interest in the role of complement in autoantibody-mediated disorders, such as ITP. A recent early-phase clinical trial of a classical complement pathway inhibitor has demonstrated efficacy in a subset of ITP patients refractory to conventional immune modulation. In this review, we will analyse the role of complement in refractory ITP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available