4.5 Article

A risk-based subgroup analysis of the effect of adjuvant S-1 in estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07099-4

Keywords

Breast neoplasms; Chemotherapy; Adjuvant; Drug therapy; Receptors; Estrogen; Recurrence

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the efficacy of S-1 in different recurrence risk subgroups. The results showed that adding S-1 to endocrine therapy significantly reduced the occurrence of iDFS events in group 2 and group 3. In patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes meeting the monarchE criteria, the addition of S-1 improved iDFS.
Purpose The Phase III POTENT trial demonstrated the efficacy of adding S-1 to adjuvant endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. We investigated the efficacy of S-1 across different recurrence risk subgroups.Methods This was a post-hoc exploratory analysis of the POTENT trial. Patients in the endocrine-therapy-only arm were divided into three groups based on composite risk values calculated from multiple prognostic factors. The effects of S-1 were estimated using the Cox model in each risk group. The treatment effects of S-1 in patients meeting the eligibility criteria of the monarchE trial were also estimated.Results A total of 1,897 patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (=lower quartile of the composite values) (N = 677), group 2 (interquartile range) (N = 767), and group 3 (> upper quartile) (N = 453). The addition of S-1 to endocrine therapy resulted in 49% (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.78) and 29% (HR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.49-1.02) reductions in invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) events in groups 2 and 3, respectively. We could not identify any benefit from the addition of S-1 in group 1. The addition of S-1 showed an improvement in iDFS in patients with one to three positive nodes meeting the monarchE cohort 1 criteria (N = 290) (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.29-0.74).Conclusions The benefit of adding adjuvant S-1 was particularly marked in group 2. Further investigations are warranted to explore the optimal usage of adjuvant S-1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available