4.5 Review

Discordance of PIK3CA mutational status between primary and metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 201, Issue 2, Pages 161-169

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07010-1

Keywords

PIK3CA; Breast cancer; Mutation; Primary; Metastasis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis indicates that there is a discordance in PIK3CA mutational status between primary and metastatic breast tumors. The overall discordance rate is 9.8% and the change is bi-directional, with more cases transitioning from mutated to wild-type status.
IntroductionIn light of the clinically meaningful results of the PI3K inhibitors in PIK3CA-mutated metastatic breast cancer (BC) patients, the reliable identification of PIK3CA mutations is of outmost importance. However, lack of evidence on the optimal site and timing of assessment, presence of temporal heterogeneity and analytical factors pose several challenges in clinical routine. We aimed to study the discordance rates of PIK3CA mutational status between primary and matched metastatic tumors.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed in three different databases (Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science) and-upon screening-a total of 25 studies reporting PIK3CA mutational status both on primary breast tumors and their matched metastases were included in this meta-analysis. The random-effects model was used for pooled analyses of discordance of PIK3CA mutational status.ResultsThe overall discordance rate of PIK3CA mutational status was 9.8% (95% CI, 7.0-13.0; n = 1425) and did not significantly differ within BC subtypes or metastatic sites. The change was bi-directional, more commonly observed from PIK3CA mutated to wild-type status (14.9%, 95% CI 11.8-18.2; n tumor pairs = 453) rather than the opposite direction (8.9%, 95% CI 6.1-12.1; n tumor pairs = 943).ConclusionsOur results indicate the need of obtaining metastatic biopsies for PIK3CA-mutation analysis and the possibility of testing of the primary tumor, in case a re-biopsy deemed non-feasible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available