4.3 Article

High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) of the left middle temporal gyrus (LMTG) improves mathematical reasoning

Journal

BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 890-900

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-023-00996-3

Keywords

Left middle temporal gyrus; Mathematical processing; Mathematical reasoning; Semantic network; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study used HD-tDCS to investigate the role of the semantic neural network in mathematical processing. The results showed that anodal HD-tDCS on the left middle temporal gyrus improved performance on the number series completion task, indicating the importance of the semantic network in mathematical processing.
The role of the visuospatial network in mathematical processing has been established, but the role of the semantic neural network in mathematical processing is still poorly understood. The current study used high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) to examine whether the semantic network supports mathematical processing. Using a single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled experimental design, 48 participants were randomly assigned to receive either anodal or sham HD-tDCS on the left middle temporal gyrus (LMTG), a core region of the semantic network. A number series completion task was used to measure mathematical reasoning and an arithmetical computation task was used as a control condition. Both tasks were administered before and after the 20 min HD-tDCS. The results showed that anodal HD-tDCS on the LMTG enhanced performance on the number series completion task, but not on the arithmetical computation task. Trial-level analysis further showed greater improvement at the more difficult problems of the number series completion task. These results demonstrate that the semantic network plays an important role in mathematical processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available