4.5 Article

Predictors of outcomes in hematopoietic cell transplantation for Fanconi anemia

Journal

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-023-02121-1

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only cure for the hematologic manifestations of Fanconi anemia (FA). This study analyzed the outcomes of pediatric and young adult patients who underwent HCT between 2007 and 2020. The results showed that age, HLA mismatch, and year of HCT were predictors of overall survival, event-free survival, and treatment-related mortality.
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only cure for the hematologic manifestations of Fanconi anemia (FA). We performed retrospective predictor analyses for HCT outcomes in FA for pediatric and young adult patients transplanted between 2007 and 2020 across three large referral institutions. Eighty-nine patients, 70 with bone marrow failure +/- cytogenetic abnormalities, 19 with MDS/AML, were included. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 83.2% and event-free survival (EFS) was 74%. Age >= 19, HLA mismatch and year of HCT were multivariable predictors (MVPs) for OS, EFS and treatment-related mortality (TRM). In the pediatric group, TCD was a borderline MVP (P = 0.059) with 5-year OS of 73.0% in TCD vs. 100% for T-replete HCT. The cumulative incidence of day 100 grade II-IV aGvHD and 5-year cGvHD were 5.6% and 4.6%, respectively. Relapse in the MDS/AML subgroup occurred in 4 patients (16%). Graft failure was seen in 9 patients (TCD 6/37 [16%]; T-replete 3/52 [5.7%]). Six patients developed malignancy after HCT. Survival chances after HCT for FA are excellent and associated with high engrafted survival and low toxicity. Age >= 19, HLA mismatch, year of transplant and 'TCD in the <19 years group' (although borderline) were found to be negative predictors for survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available