4.7 Article

High-throughput method for Oxygen Consumption Rate measurement (OCR) in plant mitochondria

Journal

BMC PLANT BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12870-023-04516-0

Keywords

Oxygen consumption rate; OCR; High-throughput plant mitochondria respiration assay; Plant mitochondria

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a novel method to measure the oxygen consumption rate in isolated mitochondria of plant seeds. The optimized protocol allows for gradual decrease in respiratory function and provides information on the activity and condition of plant mitochondria.
Background:Conventional methods to measure oxygen consumption, such as Clark-type electrodes, have limitations such as requiring a large amount of starting material. Moreover, commercially available kits for high-throughput methods are usually optimized for animal cells and mitochondria. Here, we present a novel method to measure the oxygen consumption rate using a high-throughput assay in isolated mitochondria of European beech seeds. To perform the measurements, we adapted the Agilent Seahorse XF Cell Mito Stress Test Kit protocol for measurements on plant mitochondria. Results: The optimized protocol for OCR measurement of mitochondria isolated from beech seeds allowed the observation of storage period-dependent gradual decreases in non-phosphorylating respiration, phosphorylating respiration and maximal FCCP-stimulated respiration. The longer the seeds were stored, the greater the impairment of respiratory function. Conclusions: Thanks to this method it is possible to minimize the amount of plant material and conduct research to obtain information on the respiratory condition and activity of plant mitochondria, including the efficiency of oxidative phosphorylation and the maximum oxidative capacity of the respiratory chain. We demonstrated that the improved protocol is suitable for study of plant material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available