4.8 Article

Inappropriate hospital admission as a risk factor for the subsequent development of adverse events: a cross-sectional study

Journal

BMC MEDICINE
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03024-0

Keywords

Appropriateness of health care; Inappropriate hospital admission; Patient safety; Adverse events

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to analyze the association between inappropriate hospital admission and subsequent adverse events (AEs), and compare the clinical and economic implications of AEs after inappropriate admissions with appropriate admissions. The results showed that inappropriate admissions increased the risk of subsequent AEs and doubled the number of AEs per patient. AEs after inappropriate admissions were associated with scheduled admissions, prolonged ICU stays, and incurred significant cost overruns.
BackgroundAll health overuse implies an unnecessary risk of patients suffering adverse events (AEs). However, this hypothesis has not been corroborated by direct estimates for inappropriate hospital admission (IHA). The objectives of the study were the following: (1) to analyze the association between IHA and the development of subsequent AEs; (2) to explore the distinct clinical and economic implications of AEs subsequent IHA compared to appropriate admissions.MethodsAn observational cross-sectional study was conducted on hospitalized patients in May 2019 in a high-complexity hospital in Madrid, Spain. The Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol was used to measure IHA, and the methodologies of the Harvard Medical Practice Study and the European Point Prevalence Survey of Healthcare-associated Infections were used to detect and characterize AEs. The association between IHA and the subsequent.ResultsA total of 558 patients in the hospital ward were studied. IHA increased the risk of subsequent occurrence of AEs (OR [95% CI]: 3.54 [1.87 to 6.69], versus appropriate) and doubled the mean AEs per patient (coefficient [95% CI]: 0.19 [0.08 to 0.30] increase, versus appropriate) after adjusting for confounders. IHA was a predictive variable of subsequent AEs and the number of AEs per patient. AEs developed after IHA were associated with scheduled admissions (78.9% of AEs, versus 27.9% after appropriate admissions; p < 0.001). Compared with AEs developed after appropriate admissions, AEs after IHA added 2.4 additional days of stay in the intensive care unit and incurred an extra cost of euro166,324.9 for the studied sample.ConclusionsPatients with IHA have a higher risk of subsequent occurrence of AE. Due to the multifactorial nature of AEs, IHA is a possible contributing factor. AEs developed after IHA are associated with scheduled admissions, prolonged ICU stays, and resulted in significant cost overruns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available