4.4 Article

Performing up to Nordic principles? Geographic and socioeconomic equity in ambulatory care sensitive conditions among older adults in capital areas of Denmark, Finland and Sweden in 2000-2015

Journal

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09855-0

Keywords

Equity in health care; Primary health care; Geographic disparities; Socioeconomic disparities; Health service research; Register-based study; International comparison; Nordic countries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the equity in primary healthcare performance among older adults in the capital areas of Copenhagen, Helsinki, and Stockholm. The findings indicate that while socioeconomic disparities persist, geographic disparities have reduced in Helsinki and Stockholm but persist in Copenhagen. The study suggests that Danish primary healthcare incorporates socioeconomic segregation to a lesser extent.
BackgroundDenmark, Finland and Sweden pursue equity in health for their citizens through universal health care. However, it is unclear if these services reach the older adult population equally across different socioeconomic positions or living areas. Thus, we assessed geographic and socioeconomic equity in primary health care (PHC) performance among the older adults in the capital areas of Denmark (Copenhagen), Finland (Helsinki) and Sweden (Stockholm) in 2000-2015. Hospitalisations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) were applied as a proxy for PHC performance.MethodsWe acquired individual level ACSCs for those aged & GE; 45 in 2000-2015 from national hospitalisation registers. To identify whether the disparities varied by age, we applied three age groups (those aged 45-64, 65-75 and & GE; 75). Socioeconomic disparities in ACSCs were described with incidence rate ratios (IRR) and annual rates by education, income and living-alone; and then analysed with biennial concentration indices by income. Geographic disparities were described with biennial ACSC rates by small areas and analysed with two-level Poisson multilevel models. These models provided small area estimates of IRRs of ACSCs in 2000 and their slopes for development over time, between which Pearson correlations were calculated within each capital area. Finally, these models were adjusted for income to distinguish between geographic and socioeconomic disparities.ResultsCopenhagen had the highest IRR of ACSCs among those aged 45-64, and Helsinki among those aged & GE; 75. Over time IRRs decreased among those aged & GE; 45, but only in Helsinki among those aged & GE; 75. All concentration indices slightly favoured the affluent population but in Stockholm were mainly non-significant. Among those aged & GE; 75, Pearson correlations were low in Copenhagen (-0.14; p = 0.424) but high in both Helsinki (-0.74; < 0.001) and Stockholm (-0.62; < 0.001) - with only little change when adjusted for income. Among those aged & GE; 45 the respective correlations were rather similar, except for a strong correlation in Copenhagen (-0.51, 0.001) after income adjustment.ConclusionsWhile socioeconomic disparities in PHC performance persisted among older adults in the three Nordic capital areas, geographic disparities narrowed in both Helsinki and Stockholm but persisted in Copenhagen. Our findings suggest that the Danish PHC incorporated the negative effects of socio-economic segregation to a lesser degree.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available