4.4 Article

The diversity of providers' and consumers' views of virtual versus inpatient care provision: a qualitative study

Journal

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09715-x

Keywords

Virtual care; Consumers' views of care; Providers' views of care; Qualitative research; Hospitals; Innovation in care models

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Virtual care has become increasingly popular in recent years, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study explored the expectations and perspectives of consumers and providers regarding virtual care through workshops and surveys. Virtual care was widely supported but not suitable for all patients. Considering consumer and provider views and expectations can facilitate greater acceptance and uptake of virtual care models.
BackgroundA broad-based international shift to virtual care models over recent years has accelerated following COVID-19. Although there are increasing numbers of studies and reviews, less is known about clinicians' and consumers' perspectives concerning virtual modes in contrast to inpatient modes of delivery.MethodsWe conducted a mixed-methods study in late 2021 examining consumers' and providers' expectations of and perspectives on virtual care in the context of a new facility planned for the north-western suburbs of Sydney, Australia. Data were collected via a series of workshops, and a demographic survey. Recorded qualitative text data were analysed thematically, and surveys were analysed using SPSS v22.ResultsAcross 12 workshops, 33 consumers and 49 providers from varied backgrounds, ethnicities, language groups, age ranges and professions participated. Four advantages, strengths or benefits of virtual care reported were: patient factors and wellbeing, accessibility, better care and health outcomes, and additional health system benefits, while four disadvantages, weaknesses or risks of virtual care were: patient factors and wellbeing, accessibility, resources and infrastructure, and quality and safety of care.ConclusionsVirtual care was widely supported but the model is not suitable for all patients. Health and digital literacy and appropriate patient selection were key success criteria, as was patient choice. Key concerns included technology failures or limitations and that virtual models may be no more efficient than inpatient care models. Considering consumer and provider views and expectations prior to introducing virtual models of care may facilitate greater acceptance and uptake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available