4.4 Article

Development of a conceptual framework to scale up co-managed care for older patients with hip fracture in China: a qualitative study

Journal

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09910-w

Keywords

Hip fracture; Co-managed care; Conventional care; Multidisciplinary management; Consolidated framework for implementation research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to develop a conceptual framework to guide the future scale-up of a co-managed model of care for older patients with hip fracture by identifying barriers and enablers. Through in-depth interviews with healthcare providers and administrators, barriers such as perceived complexity of implementation and lack of digital health applications, as well as enablers such as hospital authority support and sufficient skilled health providers, were identified. A conceptual framework with essential components was developed to guide the implementation of co-managed care in other hospitals.
BackgroundHip fracture creates a major burden on society due to high mortality, loss of independence and excess medical costs for older people. A multidisciplinary co-managed model of care is widely considered as the best practice for the management of older patients with hip fracture. The study aims to develop a conceptual framework to inform the future scale-up of this model of care through the identification of barriers and enablers that may influence successful uptake.MethodsThis qualitative study was conducted within an interventional study, which aimed to test the effectiveness of co-managed model of care for older patients with hip fracture. Health providers and health administrators from three hospitals were purposively selected and interviewed in-depth. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to develop interview guides, collect and analyse data. Inductive and deductive approaches were used to generate enablers or barriers, aligned with the CFIR constructs. All barriers or enablers were inductively summarised to a conceptual framework with essential components to guide the implementation of co-managed model of care in other hospitals.ResultsA total of 13 health providers and 3 health administrators were recruited. The main barriers to co-managed care implementation included perceived complexity of implementation, insufficient international collaboration and incentives, the absence of national guideline support and lack of digital health applications for communication between health providers, insufficient number of health providers and beds, and poor understanding about the effectiveness of this care model. A conceptual framework for future scale-up was then developed, consisting of the following essential components: hospital authority support, enabling environment, adequate number of beds, sufficient and skilled health providers, use of digital health technology, regular quality supervision, evaluation and feedback, and external collaborations.ConclusionsDespite the complexity of the intervention, the co-managed model of care has the potential to be implemented and promoted in China and in similar settings, although there is a need to demonstrate feasibility in different settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available