4.4 Article

Protocol for an economic evaluation of a tele-neurologic intervention alongside a stepped wedge randomised controlled trial (NeTKoH)

Journal

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09985-5

Keywords

Tele-neurology; Telemedicine; Primary care; General practitioner; Health care management; Cost-effectiveness; Cost-utility; Statutory health insurance; Claims data; Cluster randomized trial

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tele-neurology has the potential to improve access to healthcare services and quality of care in rural and underserved areas. The NeTKoH trial aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and policy implications of a tele-neurological intervention in primary care in Germany. The economic evaluation will provide high-quality evidence for the effectiveness and potential application of tele-neurological programs.
BackgroundA significant and growing portion of the global burden of diseases is caused by neurological disorders. Tele-neurology has the potential to improve access to health care services and the quality of care, particularly in rural and underserved areas. The economic evaluation of the stepped wedge randomised controlled trial NeTKoH aims to ascertain the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility regarding the effects of a tele-neurologic intervention in primary care in a rural area in Germany.MethodsThis protocol outlines the methods used when conducting the trial-based economic evaluation of NeTKoH. The outcomes used in our economic analysis are all prespecified endpoints of the NeTKoH trial. Outcomes considered for the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses will be quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from the EQ-5D-5L, proportion of neurologic problems being solved at the GP's office (primary outcome), hospital length-of-stay and number of hospital stays. Costs will be prospectively collected during the trial by the participating statutory health insurances, and will be analysed from a statutory health insurance perspective within the German health care system. This economic evaluation will be reported complying with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist.DiscussionThis within-trial economic evaluation relaying the costs and outcomes of an interdisciplinary tele-consulting intervention will provide high-quality evidence for cost-effectiveness and policy implications of a tele-neurological programme, including the potential for application in other rural areas in Germany or other jurisdictions with a comparable health system.Trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00024492), date registered: September 28, 2021.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available