4.8 Article

Single-cell Mayo Map (scMayoMap): an easy-to-use tool for cell type annotation in single-cell RNA-sequencing data analysis

Journal

BMC BIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12915-023-01728-6

Keywords

Single-cell RNA-sequencing; Cell type annotation; Cell type markers; scMayoMap; scMayoMapDatabase

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a single-cell annotation tool called scMayoMap was developed, which can provide fast and accurate cell type annotation by integrating with a comprehensive cell marker database named scMayoMapDatabase. The effectiveness of scMayoMap was demonstrated in multiple independent scRNA-seq datasets, and it has the potential to assist researchers in analyzing and annotating cell types in a user-friendly manner.
Background Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) has become a widely used tool for both basic and translational biomedical research. In scRNA-seq data analysis, cell type annotation is an essential but challenging step. In the past few years, several annotation tools have been developed. These methods require either labeled training/reference datasets, which are not always available, or a list of predefined cell subset markers, which are subject to biases. Thus, a user-friendly and precise annotation tool is still critically needed.Results We curated a comprehensive cell marker database named scMayoMapDatabase and developed a companion R package scMayoMap, an easy-to-use single-cell annotation tool, to provide fast and accurate cell type annotation. The effectiveness of scMayoMap was demonstrated in 48 independent scRNA-seq datasets across different platforms and tissues. Additionally, the scMayoMapDatabase can be integrated with other tools and further improve their performance.Conclusions scMayoMap and scMayoMapDatabase will help investigators to define the cell types in their scRNA-seq data in a streamlined and user-friendly way.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available