4.8 Article

Combination of biological pretreatment with deep eutectic solvent pretreatment for enhanced enzymatic saccharification of Pinus massoniana

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 380, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129110

Keywords

Pinus massoniana; Fungal pretreatment; DES pretreatment; Saccharification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study combined brown rot fungi and deep eutectic solvent (DES) to pretreat Pinus massoniana, and found that the combined ChCl-Lac/fungal pretreatments effectively improved enzymatic saccharification efficiency. The surface structure of Pinus massoniana was significantly modified and hemicellulose and lignin were removed and cellulose was enriched after the pretreatments.
Lignocellulosic biorefineries depended on effective pretreatment strategies to improve the conversion efficiency of the enzymatic hydrolysis. Here, this study coupled brown rot fungi and deep eutectic solvent (DES) to pretreat Pinus massoniana. The results showed that compared to fungal pretreatment and DES pretreatment alone, the combined ChCl-Lac/fungal pretreatments could effectively improve enzymatic saccharification of Pinus mas-soniana. The highest content of releasing reducing sugar reached 510.3 mg/g substrate. Environmental scanning electron micrograph (ESEM) showed that the surface structure of Pinus massoniana was almost completely torn and loose and FT-IR spectra and component analysis revealed that most of hemicellulose and lignin were selected removed and cellulose was enriched after ChCl-Lac/fungal pretreatments, which could account for the enhanced hydrolysis efficiency. The combination of biological pretreatment with DES pretreatment could be a mild and promising pretreatment approach for enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulose and had an extensive appli-cation prospect in the field of biorefinery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available