4.6 Article

Multi-scale dual domain network for nonlinear magnetization signal filtering in magnetic particle imaging

Journal

BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL
Volume 85, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104863

Keywords

Magnetic particle imaging; Signal denoising; Convolutional neural networks; Biomedical signal processing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) achieves functional imaging by generating nonlinear response signals using magnetic nanoparticles in a magnetic field. MPI is a highly sensitive tracer-based imaging technology that offers new possibilities for biomedical applications. However, background signals, such as random thermal noise and harmonic interference, restrict the performance of MPI.
Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) realizes functional imaging by generating nonlinear response signals in the magnetic field through magnetic nanoparticles. MPI is a highly sensitive tracer-based imaging technology, which opens new possibilities for promising biomedical applications. However, in practice, the background signals, including random thermal noise from MPI receive chains and the harmonic interference caused by nonlinear components under a high-frequency excitation field, restrict the MPI performance. In this study, we propose a learning-based method by training a multi-scale dual-domain network to effectively filter the MPI signals. In the model, a multi-channel filtering module was designed to suppress the noise-related features in time and fre-quency domains. We constructed four different MPI signal datasets including simulated and measured noises acquired from a homemade MPI system to verify our method. The signal filtering tests were performed on synthetic and measured data. The experimental results indicated that our method can achieve the best perfor-mance among state-of-art signal filtering methods. Especially, on the dataset containing measured noise, our proposal improved the signal-to-noise ratio from 6.88 dB to 29.11 dB. Moreover, the percentage root means square difference was reduced from 51.26 to 3.96 and the root mean square error was reduced from 65.07 x 10-4 to 5.29 x 10-4.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available