4.7 Article

Pyrolysis of sawdust impregnated with bio-oil of the same origin: Influence of organics in bio-oil on property of biochar

Journal

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
Volume 178, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106961

Keywords

Pyrolysis; Bio-oil; Biochar; Tar; Volatile-char interaction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the pyrolysis of poplar sawdust impregnated with different bio-oil fractions was conducted. It was found that the organics in the bio-oil could react with biochar, increasing biochar production. Additionally, impregnation of bio-oil lowered the activation energy and ignition temperatures for combustion, enhanced deoxygenation, and facilitated the formation of mesopores.
Reactive organics in bio-oil might further react with biochar of the same origin during pyrolysis. This was investigated herein via conducting the pyrolysis of poplar sawdust impregnated with a heavy fraction of the bio-oil from the same biomass at 400 or 600 degrees C. The results showed that the organics in the bio-oil for impregnation involved in the pyrolysis by enhancing biochar production via cross-polymerization with the organics on biochar and/or the reactive products like aldehydes/furans and some heavy organics. This led to the formation of additional carbonaceous deposit of aliphatic nature on the surface of biochar. This, however, did not enhance the thermal stability of the biochar but lowered activation energy and ignition temperatures for combustion. In addition, the organics in the bio-oil impregnated could also enhance deoxygenation, producing the biochar with the O mass fraction lower than counterpart by 24.1% at 400 degrees C. Moreover, impregnation of bio-oil also facilitated the formation of mesopores (S > (2nm): 178.6 m(2) g(-1) versus 117.6 m(2) g(-1) of counterpart) and created a carbonyls-deficient surface of the biochar.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available