4.7 Review

Strategies for Anisotropic Fibrillar Hydrogels: Design, Cell Alignment, and Applications in Tissue Engineering

Journal

BIOMACROMOLECULES
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages 4532-4552

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.3c00503

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review investigates different techniques for aligning polymer fibrils within hydrogels to promote cell adhesion and spatial organization. These techniques include mechanical strains, temperature modulation, fluidic dynamics, chemical modulators, as well as the use of magnetic and electric fields. These methods have significant implications for cellular alignment in the fields of biomaterials and tissue engineering.
Efficient cellular alignment in biomaterials presents a considerable challenge, demanding the refinement of appropriate material morphologies, while ensuring effective cell-surface interactions. To address this, biomaterials are continuously researched with diverse coatings, hydrogels, and polymeric surfaces. In this context, we investigate the influence of physicochemical parameters on the architecture of fibrillar hydrogels that significantly orient the topography of flexible hydrogel substrates, thereby fostering cellular adhesion and spatial organization. Our Review comprehensively assesses various techniques for aligning polymer fibrils within hydrogels, specifically interventions applied during and after the cross-linking process. These methodologies include mechanical strains, precise temperature modulation, controlled fluidic dynamics, and chemical modulators, as well as the use of magnetic and electric fields. We highlight the intrinsic appeal of these methodologies in fabricating cell-aligning interfaces and discuss their potential implications within the fields of biomaterials and tissue engineering, particularly concerning the pursuit of optimal cellular alignment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available