4.4 Article

Introduced mangroves exhibit less leaf damage and greater performance than native mangroves

Journal

BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages 3503-3515

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-023-03120-5

Keywords

Enemy escape; Enemy release hypothesis; Folivory; Herbivory; Mangroves; Rhizophora

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The enemy release hypothesis (ERH) predicts that introduced species suffer less damage from enemies during invasion, leading to increased performance in the introduced range. This study tested the predictions of the ERH for introduced red mangroves in Hawaii and native populations in the Caribbean and Florida. Results showed that native mangroves experienced significantly higher leaf damage, leaf loss, and produced fewer twigs and propagules compared to introduced mangroves. Leaf production and necrotic area expansion were similar. These findings suggest that the introduced mangroves have less leaf damage and may exhibit increased growth and fecundity.
The enemy release hypothesis (ERH) predicts that introduced species leave most enemies behind during the invasion process, resulting in less enemy damage and increased performance in their introduced range. In Hawai'i, introduced red mangroves (Rhizophora mangle) convert open shorelines into dense mangrove forests. While previous studies show introduced mangroves harbor a lower occurrence of damage on various plant structures, it remains unknown if the magnitude of damage to mangrove leaves and metrics of performance differ between introduced and native populations. In this study, we tested some of the predictions of the ERH through leaf damage surveys and a year-long damage experiment replicated in 8-10 sites in the native (Caribbean and Florida) and introduced (Hawai'i) range of red mangroves. In each site, we (1) compared the percentage of leaf area damaged, (2) measured metrics of performance (leaf loss, leaf, twig, and propagule production), and (3) experimentally tested how rapidly necrosis spreads on artificially-damaged leaves of R. mangle. Our results were largely consistent with the ERH. Native mangroves exhibited orders of magnitude higher leaf damage than introduced mangroves, suffered nearly twice the leaf loss, and produced fewer twigs and propagules than introduced mangroves over one year. Leaf production and the expansion of necrotic area on leaves were similar. Broadly, our study demonstrates that introduced mangroves experience substantially less leaf damage and thus, may be exhibiting evidence of increased growth and fecundity. Our results may help explain why introduced mangroves continue to be so productive and are considered invasive in Hawaiian habitats.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available