4.3 Article

Engineering of conserved residues near antibody heavy chain complementary determining region 3 (HCDR3) improves both affinity and stability

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2023.140915

Keywords

Antibody; Antibody engineering; Vernier zone; Affinity-stability trade-offs; Molecular dynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on a mutagenesis study of conserved residues near HCDR3, it was found that key residues positioned around the salt bridge between VH-K94 and VH-D101 have an extensive impact on the conformation of HCDR3, thus providing insights for simultaneously improving both affinity and stability of antibodies.
Affinity and stability are crucial parameters in antibody development and engineering approaches. Although improvement in both metrics is desirable, trade-offs are almost unavoidable. Heavy chain complementarity determining region 3 (HCDR3) is the best-known region for antibody affinity but its impact on stability is often neglected. Here, we present a mutagenesis study of conserved residues near HCDR3 to elicit the role of this region in the affinity-stability trade-off. These key residues are positioned around the conserved salt bridge between VH-K94 and VH-D101 which is crucial for HCDR3 integrity. We show that the additional salt bridge at the stem of HCDR3 (VH-K94:VH-D101:VH-D102) has an extensive impact on this loop's conformation, therefore simultaneous improvement in both affinity and stability. We find that the disruption of 7C-7C stacking near HCDR3 (VH-Y100E:VL-Y49) at the VH-VL interface cause an irrecoverable loss in stability even if it improves the affinity. Molecular simulations of putative rescue mutants exhibit complex and often non-additive effects. We confirm that our experimental measurements agree with the molecular dynamic simulations providing detailed insights for the spatial orientation of HCDR3. VH-V102 right next to HCDR3 salt bridge might be an ideal candidate to overcome affinity-stability trade-off.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available