Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Songs versus colours versus horns: what explains the diversity of sexually selected traits?
John J. Wiens et al.
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS (2020)
A tale of two species: human and peafowl interactions in human-dominated landscapes influence each other's behaviour
Dhanashree Paranjpe et al.
CURRENT SCIENCE (2020)
Females as mobile resources: communal roosts promote the adoption of lek breeding in a temperate bat
Cory A. Toth et al.
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY (2015)
Deceptive Copulation Calls Attract Female Visitors to Peacock Leks
Roslyn Dakin et al.
AMERICAN NATURALIST (2014)
Male display areas in exploded leks: the importance of food resources for male mating success
Juan Carlos Alonso et al.
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY (2012)
Peacocks orient their courtship displays towards the sun
Roslyn Dakin et al.
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY (2009)
Peahens do not prefer peacocks with more elaborate trains
Mariko Takahashi et al.
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR (2008)
Environmental and social constraints on breeding site selection.: Does the exploded-lek and hotspot model apply to the Houbara bustard Chlamydotis undulata undulata?
Yves Hingrat et al.
JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY (2008)
Indirect mate choice, direct mate choice and species recognition in a bower-building cichlid fish lek
M. J. Genner et al.
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY (2008)
Non-defendable resources affect peafowl lek organization: A male removal experiment
Adeline Loyau et al.
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES (2007)
How is female mate choice affected by male competition?
BBM Wong et al.
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS (2005)
Intra-and intersexual selection for multiple traits in the peacock (Pavo cristatus)
A Loyau et al.
ETHOLOGY (2005)
Resource defence on exploded leks:: do male little bustards, T-tetrax, control resources for females?
F Jiguet et al.
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR (2002)
Correlation between male size and territory quality: consequence of male competition or predation susceptibility?
U Candolin et al.
OIKOS (2001)
Share Paper
