4.5 Article

Predicting self-injurious behavior at age three among infant siblings of children with autism

Journal

AUTISM RESEARCH
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aur.2981

Keywords

autism spectrum disorder; early childhood; self-injurious behavior

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Self-injurious behavior (SIB) is common in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and can occur at different ages. Previous research has shown a link between SIB at 12 months and SIB at 24 months. This study extends these findings by examining SIB occurrence and associated risk factors at 36 months. The results show that a diagnosis of ASD, SIB at 12 months, stereotypy, hyper- and hypo- sensory responsivity, and lower intellectual functioning are significant predictors of SIB at 36 months.
Existing research suggests that self-injurious behavior (SIB) is a relatively common interfering behavior that can occur across the lifespan of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We previously reported that SIB or proto-injurious SIB at 12 months was related to increased risk of SIB at 24 months among a preschool sample of children with a high familial likelihood for ASD (Dimian et al., 2017). In the present study, we extend these findings, examine SIB occurrence, and associated potential risk factors at 36 months. The present sample included 149 infants with an older sibling with ASD (65.8% male) who completed assessments at ages 12, 24, and 36 months. Descriptive analyses and binary logistic regression models were utilized. SIB was more prevalent among those children who received a diagnosis of ASD. Logistic regression indicated that presence of SIB, stereotypy, hyper- and hypo- sensory responsivity, and lower intellectual functioning at age 12 months significantly predicted the occurrence of SIB at 36 months. These findings have implications for understanding developmental processes culminating in persistent SIB and may inform prevention programming.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available