4.7 Article

Impact of urban spatial factors on NO2 concentration based on different socio-economic restriction scenarios in US cities

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 316, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120191

Keywords

Air pollution; Time-series forecasting; Public health; Socio-economic restrictions; Local neighbourhood

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The socio-economic restriction measures implemented in the United States have significantly reduced nitrogen dioxide (NO2) emissions. The study highlights the impact of factors such as human mobility, population density, income, climate, and stationary sources on the reduction of NO2 at different stations. The research emphasizes the scientific impacts of the NO2 reduction and income inequality revealed by the pandemic on air quality and health disparities.
The impact of socio-economic restriction measures in the United States showed a significant reduction in nitrogen dioxide (NO2) emissions due to the changes in commuting patterns, travel restrictions, and reduced social and economic activities. The data from 60 observation stations across different states representing of different urban settings were used to assess the impacts of dynamic changes in human mobility and static emission sources on NO2 concentrations. Two predictive models, Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average with eXogenous (SARIMAX) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), were used to forecast NO2 concentrations under a counterfactual scenario in the assumption of no lockdown was implemented. The predicted concentrations were then compared to the observed concentrations to evaluate the difference between the two scenarios, during lockdown and after lockdown by using the last five-years (2015-2019) average as baseline. Results showed that reduction in NO2 varied across stations due to a combination of factors such as human mobility, population density, income, local climate, and stationary sources of NO2 emissions in the neighbourhood. The stations located in high-income regions with higher population density experienced a greater reduction in mobility, resulting in a greater variation in NO2 levels during both periods. In contrast, stations in densely populated lowincome regions experienced lower variation in mobility and NO2 levels during the lockdown period but showed recovery during the post-lockdown period. Stations located outside the city with very low population density experienced no significant reduction in NO2 emissions. The study highlights the disparities in NO2 reduction and income inequality exposed by the pandemic, which may have scientific impacts on air quality and health disparities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available