4.7 Article

Rapidly Evolving Transients in Archival ZTF Public Alerts

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 955, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace4bc

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we searched for rapidly evolving transient (RET) candidates using the archival data from the Zwicky Transient Facility public survey between May 2018 and December 2021. Our search identified 19 bona fide RET candidates, corresponding to a discovery rate of around 5.2 events per year. Among these candidates, some were found to be Galactic events, while others were confirmed as extragalactic RETs. The origin of a few events remains undetermined. Our study also placed an upper limit on the volumetric rate of GW170817-like KNe, which can be used for quantifying contaminants in transient alert streams when searching for KNe independently of gravitational-wave and gamma-ray-burst triggers.
We search the archival Zwicky Transient Facility public survey for rapidly evolving transient (RET) candidates based on well-defined criteria between 2018 May and 2021 December. The search yielded 19 bona fide RET candidates, corresponding to a discovery rate of similar to 5.2 events per year. Even with a Galactic latitude cut of 20 degrees, eight of the 19 events (similar to 42%) are Galactic, including one with a light-curve shape closely resembling that of the GW170817 kilonova (KN). An additional event is a nova in M31. Four out of the 19 events (similar to 21%) are confirmed extragalactic RETs (one confirmed here for the first time) and the origin of six additional events cannot be determined. We did not find any extragalactic events resembling the GW170817 KN, from which we obtain an upper limit on the volumetric rate of GW170817-like KNe of R <= 2400 Gpc-3 yr-1 (95% confidence). These results can be used for quantifying contaminants to RET searches in transient alert streams, specifically when searching for KNe independently of gravitational-wave and gamma-ray-burst triggers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available