4.6 Article

Evidence That the Occurrence Rate of Hot Jupiters around Sun-like Stars Decreases with Stellar Age

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 166, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/acff71

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the relationship between the occurrence rate of giant planets around Sun-like stars and the age, mass, and metallicity of the host stars. By using a Bayesian framework, we find evidence that the number of hot Jupiters decreases over time, while that of cold Jupiters remains constant.
We investigate how the occurrence rate of giant planets (minimum mass > 0.3 M-Jup) around Sun-like stars depends on the age, mass, and metallicity of their host stars. We develop a hierarchical Bayesian framework to infer the number of planets per star (NPPS) as a function of both planetary and stellar parameters. The framework fully takes into account the uncertainties in the latter by utilizing the posterior samples for the stellar parameters obtained by fitting stellar isochrone models to the spectroscopic parameters, Gaia DR3 parallaxes, and 2MASS K-s-band magnitudes adopting a certain bookkeeping prior. We apply the framework to 46 Doppler giants found around a sample of 382 Sun-like stars from the California Legacy Survey catalog that publishes spectroscopic parameters and search completeness for all the surveyed stars. We find evidence that the NPPS of hot Jupiters (orbital period P = 1-10 days) decreases roughly in the latter half of the main sequence over the timescale of O(Gyr), while that of cold Jupiters (P = 1-10 yr) does not. Assuming that this decrease is real and caused by tidal orbital decay, the modified stellar tidal quality factor Q'(*) is implied to be O(10(6)) for a Sun-like main-sequence star orbited by a Jupiter-mass planet with P approximate to 3 days.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available