4.7 Article

Optimum operation of an ejector-assisted combined flash-binary geothermal cycle using R245fa-isopentane mixture-based secondary working fluids

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 231, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121012

Keywords

Combined flash binary geothermal cycle; Ejector; R245fa-isopentane mixture; Second law efficiency; Power output

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the steam flashing device of the conventional combined flash binary geothermal cycle (CFBGC) is replaced by an ejector to enhance power output. The optimized ejector assisted combined flash binary geothermal cycle (EACFBGC) achieves a 8.08% higher second law efficiency and a 5.7% lower levelized cost of electricity compared to the conventional CFBGC for geo-fluid available at 170 degrees C.
Combined flash binary geothermal cycle (CFBGC) is a traditional geothermal energy conversion technology. However, in a CFBGC, substantial exergy destruction occurs during the steam flashing. To address this issue, in the present study, the steam flashing device of the conventional CFBGC is replaced by an ejector. The ejector enhances steam cycle power output by ensuring a higher steam flow rate through the high-pressure steam turbine stage. The modified cycle is designated as the ejector assisted combined flash binary geothermal cycle (EACFBGC). To take advantage of temperature glide, various compositions of R245fa-isopentane mixture are considered as secondary working fluid. Optimum operating parameters corresponding to the maximum second law efficiencies of the proposed and conventional cycles are explored by applying an iterative method. Both considered cycles yield the highest second law efficiencies with the 0.7 mol fraction of isopentane in the working fluid mixture. For geo-fluid available at 170 degrees C, the second law efficiency of the optimized EACFBGC is about 8.08% higher than that of the optimized conventional CFBGC. The corresponding levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) is also 5.7% lower. In a word, the proposed EACFBGC can be considered as the upgraded CFBGC with higher energy conversion efficiency and a lower LCOE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available