4.6 Article

The variation in wall shear stress induced by a linear train of soft particles in channel flow

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 123, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0158313

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We explore the changes in wall shear stress caused by migrating soft particles modeled as capsules in a channel. It is interesting to note that the wall shear stress shows a roughly linear increase in both its maximum value and variation magnitude as the normalized overall lateral position of the capsules increases when they form a linear train. Furthermore, for a single stable capsule in the channel, the streamlines exhibit an M-like shape in the upper part and a W-like shape in the lower part. The vertical velocity is used to explain the peak-valley-peak structure in the wall shear stress profile, and for multiple capsules, the contours of vertical velocity can determine the locations of the peaks or valleys in the wall shear stress.
We investigate the wall shear stress variation induced by soft particles modeled as capsules migrating in a channel. Interestingly, the wall shear stress exhibits a roughly linear increase in both its global maximum value and variation magnitude with an increase in the normalized overall lateral position of the capsules when they stabilize as a linear train. Furthermore, when a single capsule stabilizes in the channel centerline, the streamlines show an M-like shape in the upper part and a W-like shape in the lower part of the channel. Meanwhile, we use the vertical velocity to explain the typical peak-valley-peak structure in the wall shear stress profile. For multiple capsules, the contours of the vertical velocity can also be employed to determine the locations where the peaks or valleys in the wall shear stress occur. These findings enhance our comprehension of the variation in wall shear stress caused by soft particles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available