4.7 Article

Simplified estimation of wave attenuation in marginal ice zone using homogenized scattering model

Journal

APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH
Volume 138, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2023.103663

Keywords

Water waves; Marginal ice zone; Wave attenuation; Scattering process; Dispersion relation; Homogenization; Synthetic ice experiment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A theoretical model is proposed to explain the scattering process of wave attenuation in a marginal ice zone. A simplified estimation method is developed to explicitly describe its fundamental mechanisms. Theoretical results show the same tendency and order as the experimental results, validating the proposed theory.
A theoretical model to explain the scattering process of wave attenuation in a marginal ice zone is proposed. Although many numerical methods have been developed to accurately estimate wave attenuation, it is not easy to incorporate this knowledge and results into practical use. Therefore, a simplified estimation method is developed here to explicitly and simply describe its fundamental mechanisms. We consider a periodic array of ice floes, where the floe is modeled by a vertical rigid cylinder. Using a homogenization technique, a homogenized free surface equivalent to the array is obtained. Then, we show that a dispersion relation of the homogenized free surface waves makes all wave numbers complex. As a result, the exponential energy decay in the scattering process is demonstrated. Under the deep water assumption, the wave attenuation coefficient is proportional to the open water's wave number, ice concentration ratio, and imaginary part of the floe's heave motion. To validate the proposed theory, a tank experiment was also conducted using cylindrical synthetic ice plates. Although our model is obtained under many simplifications, the theoretical results show the same tendency and order as the experimental results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available