4.4 Article

Structural identifiability analysis of a cardiovascular system model

Journal

MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages 433-441

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.02.005

Keywords

Identifiability; Parameter identification; Lumped-parameter model; Physiological model

Funding

  1. French Community of Belgium (Actions de Recherches Concertees - Academie Wallonie-Europe)
  2. Belgian Funds for Scientific Research (F.RS.-FNRS)
  3. EU Marie Curie Actions (FP7-PEOPLE-IRSES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The six-chamber cardiovascular system model of Burkhoff and Tyberg has been used in several theoretical and experimental studies. However, this cardiovascular system model (and others derived from it) are not identifiable from any output set. In this work, two such cases of structural non-identifiability are first presented. These cases occur when the model output set only contains a single type of information (pressure or volume). A specific output set is thus chosen, mixing pressure and volume information and containing only a limited number of clinically available measurements. Then, by manipulating the model equations involving these outputs, it is demonstrated that the six-chamber cardiovascular system model is structurally globally identifiable. A further simplification is made, assuming known cardiac valve resistances. Because of the poor practical identifiability of these four parameters, this assumption is usual. Under this hypothesis, the six chamber cardiovascular system model is structurally identifiable from an even smaller dataset. As a consequence, parameter values computed from limited but well-chosen datasets are theoretically unique. This means that the parameter identification procedure can safely be performed on the model from such a well-chosen dataset. Thus, the model may be considered suitable for use in diagnosis. (C) 2016 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available