4.8 Article

Urea-Functionalized Fe4L6 Cages for Supramolecular Gold Catalyst Encapsulation to Control Substrate Activation Modes

Journal

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202310420

Keywords

Cage Compounds; Gold Catalysis; Hydroamination; Hydrogen Bonding; Selectivity and Reactivity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of a supramolecular strategy to encapsulate single catalysts and substrates in a urea-functionalized Fe4L6 cage allows for effective control of catalyst activity and selectivity. The unique structure of the cage enables the catalyst to function solely through pi activation of the substrate, resulting in significant selectivity, and the encapsulated catalyst shows higher activity compared to the free analogue.
The excellent catalytic performances of enzymes in terms of activity and selectivity are an inspiration for synthetic chemists and this has resulted in the development of synthetic containers for supramolecular catalysis. In such containers the local environment and pre-organization of catalysts and substrates leads to control of the activity and selectivity of the catalyst. Herein we report a supramolecular strategy to encapsulate single catalysts in a urea-functionalized Fe4L6 cage, which can co-encapsulate a functionalized urea substrate through hydrogen bonding. Distinguished selectivity is obtained, imposed by the cage as site isolation only allows catalysis through pi activation of the substrate and as a result the selectivity is independent of catalyst concentration. The encapsulated catalyst is more active than the free analogue, an effect that can be ascribed to transitionstate stabilization rather than substrate pre-organization, as revealed by the MM kinetic data. The simple strategy reported here is expected to be of general use in many reactions, for which the catalyst can be functionalized with a sulfonate group required for encapsulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available