4.8 Article

Biosynthesis of Phomactin Platelet Activating Factor Antagonist Requires a Two-Enzyme Cascade

Journal

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202312996

Keywords

Biosynthesis; Cytochrome P450 Enzymes; Heterologous Expression; Phomactins; Terpene Cyclase

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals the biosynthesis of phomactin natural products, which only requires two enzymes and involves rearrangement of the diterpene scaffold. The mechanism of phomactin biosynthesis was investigated through isotope labeling experiments and crystal complex analysis, providing insights into the efficient production of phomactins using synthetic biology approaches.
Phomactin diterpenoids possess a unique bicyclo[9.3.1]pentadecane skeleton with multiple oxidative modifications, and are good platelet-activating factor (PAF) antagonists that can inhibit PAF-induced platelet aggregation. In this study, we identified the gene cluster (phm) responsible for the biosynthesis of phomactins from a marine fungus, Phoma sp. ATCC 74077. Despite the complexity of their structures, phomactin biosynthesis only requires two enzymes: a type I diterpene cyclase PhmA and a P450 monooxygenase PhmC. PhmA was found to catalyze the formation of the phomactatriene, while PhmC sequentially catalyzes the oxidation of multiple sites, leading to the generation of structurally diverse phomactins. The rearrangement mechanism of the diterpene scaffold was investigated through isotope labeling experiments. Additionally, we obtained the crystal complex of PhmA with its substrate analogue FGGPP and elucidated the novel metal-ion-binding mode and enzymatic mechanism of PhmA through site-directed mutagenesis. This study provides the first insight into the biosynthesis of phomactins, laying the foundation for the efficient production of phomactin natural products using synthetic biology approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available