4.8 Article

Data-Driven Tool for Cross-Run Ion Selection and Peak-Picking in Quantitative Proteomics with Data-Independent Acquisition LC-MS/MS

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 95, Issue 45, Pages 16558-16566

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c02689

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proteomics is essential for understanding biology and diseases, with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) being a widely used platform. Data-independent acquisition (DIA) improves the reproducibility of LC-MS/MS in proteomics research. However, existing DIA data processing tools sometimes lead to significant deviations in quantification. This study presents a cross-run ion selection and peak-picking (CRISP) tool that takes advantage of the consistency of DIA data across runs to filter out interfering signals, resulting in improved quantification accuracy.
Proteomics provides molecular bases of biology and disease, and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is a platform widely used for bottom-up proteomics. Data-independent acquisition (DIA) improves the run-to-run reproducibility of LC-MS/MS in proteomics research. However, the existing DIA data processing tools sometimes produce large deviations from true values for the peptides and proteins in quantification. Peak-picking error and incorrect ion selection are the two main causes of the deviations. We present a cross-run ion selection and peak-picking (CRISP) tool that utilizes the important advantage of run-to-run consistency of DIA and simultaneously examines the DIA data from the whole set of runs to filter out the interfering signals, instead of only looking at a single run at a time. Eight datasets acquired by mass spectrometers from different vendors with different types of mass analyzers were used to benchmark our CRISP-DIA against other currently available DIA tools. In the benchmark datasets, for analytes with large content variation among samples, CRISP-DIA generally resulted in 20 to 50% relative decrease in error rates compared to other DIA tools, at both the peptide precursor level and the protein level. CRISP-DIA detected differentially expressed proteins more efficiently, with 3.3 to 90.3% increases in the numbers of true positives and 12.3 to 35.3% decreases in the false positive rates, in some cases. In the real biological datasets, CRISP-DIA showed better consistencies of the quantification results. The advantages of assimilating DIA data in multiple runs for quantitative proteomics were demonstrated, which can significantly improve the quantification accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available