4.5 Article

Development, optimization and validation of LC-MS/MS method for the determination of DBS GALT enzyme activity

Journal

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 678, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2023.115284

Keywords

GALT; LC-MS/MS; Newborn screening; Dried blood spot

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A robust LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for assessing GALT activity in dried blood spot samples. The method showed good performance in sample collection, reaction stopping, and stability.
Galactosemia is a carbohydrate metabolism disorder often caused by galactose-1-phosphate uridyl transferase (GALT) deficiency. Detecting GALT deficiency involves measuring intra-erythrocyte enzyme activity. We aimed to create a robust liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to assess GALT activity in dried blood spot (DBS) samples. We validated this method and compared it to the fluorometric approach. We investigated the impact of K2EDTA and lithium heparin tubes on enzyme activity to identify the best sample collection tube. We also assessed the reaction-stopping method. The developed approach employed [13C6]galactose-1-phosphate as a substrate and UDP-N-acetylglycosamine as an internal standard (IS). The mean +/- SD value for GALT activity of DBS samples was determined as 6.37 +/- 1.96 mu mol/gHb/hour. The linear range was 0.4-50 mu M (2.4-310% of normal) in the DBS method. The % coefficient of variation (%CV) values were less than 15 for intra-day and inter-day repeatability studies. Over 90% recovery was achieved in recovery studies, and no ion suppression from matrix was detected. DBS samples were quite stable for 31 days under different storage conditions. Enzyme activity results reported as <3.5 U/g Hb by fluorometric method, were quantitatively determined for even very low concentrations by LC-MS/MS method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available