4.7 Article

Development of matrix-based reference materials for 17 beta-estradiol by the recommended reference method of ID-LC-MS/MS

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 415, Issue 23, Pages 5637-5644

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-023-04832-2

Keywords

17 Beta-estradiol; Human serum-based; Reference material; ID-LC-MS/MS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We developed and evaluated two-level serum-based reference materials (RMs) for measuring 17 beta-estradiol (17 beta-E2). These RMs were extracted from the remaining serum samples after routine clinical tests, and were developed to improve clinical routine testing and provide traceable results. This paper discusses the development process of these RMs.
We developed and evaluated two-level, namely 2017011 and 2017012, serum-based reference materials (RMs) for 17 beta-estradiol (17 beta-E2) by the reference method of isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS) from the remaining serum samples after routine clinical tests, to help improve clinical routine testing and provide the traceability of results. This paper describes the development process of these RMs. The National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ) certified reference material (CRM) 6004-a was used as the primary RM for the measurement of 17 beta-E2. These serum-based RMs showed satisfactory homogeneity and stability. They also assessed the commutability between the reference method and the three routine clinical immunoassay systems. Besides, a collaborative study was carried out in five reference laboratories, all of which had been accredited by the China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment (CNAS) in accordance with ISO/ WD 15725-1. Statistical analysis of raw results and uncertainty assessment obtained certified values: 2017011 was 445.2 +/- 39.0 pmol/L, and 2017012 was 761.9 +/- 35.5 pmol/L.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available