4.2 Article

Human papillomavirus detection using in situ hybridization and correlations with histological and cytological findings

Journal

MEDECINE ET MALADIES INFECTIEUSES
Volume 46, Issue 7, Pages 380-384

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.medmal.2016.07.001

Keywords

Histology; Human papillomavirus; In situ hybridization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and objective. - The human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main causative agent of cancerous and precancerouS lesions in cervical cancers. The infection detection is performed by cytological and histological examination. However, molecular testing for HPV infection remains necessary to distinguish nonspecific inflammatory lesions from HPV-related lesions. We aimed to compare cytological and histological diagnosis of HPV lesions and to confront histological findings with molecular detection of HPV by in situ hybridization (ISH). Material and methods. - A total of 2399 pap smears were collected between 1997 and 2002. Twenty-nine of them presented with lesions indicative of HPV infection. Colposcopy and biopsy were performed on 23 of these 29 pap smears, with a comparison of the cytological and histological findings. Molecular testing for HPV by ISH was performed on 11 pap smears. Results. - A 79% cytological and histological agreement was observed. ISH revealed the presence of the virus in seven case patients, amounting to a 63% histological and molecular agreement. Seven HPV genotypes were categorized (6-11-16-18-31-33-51). Conclusion. - HPV detection by ISH adds little to the diagnosis of HPV-associated lesions based on cytological and histological features. It, however, helps improve the specificity of the diagnosis and determine the viral genotype which, in turn, helps better define the lesion prognosis. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available