4.5 Review

Mechanistic and Clinical Comparison of the Erythropoietic Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors and Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Renal Anemia

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000531084

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Renal anemia is commonly treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), which have cardiovascular risks. Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase domain (HIF-PHD) inhibitors are an alternative therapy but can also increase cardiovascular risks. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, on the other hand, reduce cardiovascular risks and effectively alleviate anemia by increasing hemoglobin levels. The selective increase of HIF-2 alpha and downregulation of HIF-1 alpha by SGLT2 inhibitors may contribute to their cardiorenal benefits. Therefore, SGLT2 inhibitors should be seriously evaluated as a safer therapeutic approach for renal anemia.
Renal anemia is treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), even though epoetin alfa and darbepoetin increase the risk of cardiovascular death and thromboembolic events, including stroke. Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase domain (HIF-PHD) inhibitors have been developed as an alternative to ESAs, producing comparable increases in hemoglobin. However, in advanced chronic kidney disease, HIF-PHD inhibitors can increase the risk of cardiovascular death, heart failure, and thrombotic events to a greater extent than that with ESAs, indicating that there is a compelling need for safer alternatives. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events, and they increase hemoglobin, an effect that is related to an increase in erythropoietin and an expansion in red blood cell mass. SGLT2 inhibitors increase hemoglobin by approximate to 0.6-0.7 g/dL, resulting in the alleviation of anemia in many patients. The magnitude of this effect is comparable to that seen with low-to-medium doses of HIF-PHD inhibitors, and it is apparent even in advanced chronic kidney disease. Interestingly, HIF-PHD inhibitors act by interfering with the prolyl hydroxylases that degrade both HIF-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha, thus enhancing both isoforms. However, HIF-2 alpha is the physiological stimulus to the production of erythropoietin, and upregulation of HIF-1 alpha may be an unnecessary ancillary property of HIF-PHD inhibitors, which may have adverse cardiac and vascular consequences. In contrast, SGLT2 inhibitors act to selectively increase HIF-2 alpha, while downregulating HIF-1 alpha, a distinctive profile that may contribute to their cardiorenal benefits. Intriguingly, for both HIF-PHD and SGLT2 inhibitors, the liver is likely to be an important site of increased erythropoietin production, recapitulating the fetal phenotype. These observations suggest that the use of SGLT2 inhibitors should be seriously evaluated as a therapeutic approach to treat renal anemia, yielding less cardiovascular risk than other therapeutic options.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available