4.7 Article

Biomarker disclosure protocols in prodromal Alzheimer's disease clinical trials

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/alz.13380

Keywords

amyloid; biomarker disclosure; mild cognitive impairment; prodromal Alzheimer's disease; randomized controlled trials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) has allowed researchers to improve sample homogeneity and test candidate treatments earlier in the disease. However, it is unknown to what extent standardized methods for disclosing biomarker testing results to research participants are implemented in trials.
INTRODUCTIONThe development of biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) has allowed researchers to increase sample homogeneity and test candidate treatments earlier in the disease. The integration of biomarker screening criteria should be met with a parallel implementation of standardized methods to disclose biomarker testing results to research participants; however, the extent to which protocolized disclosure occurs in trials is unknown. METHODSWe reviewed the literature to identify prodromal AD trials published in the past 10 years. From these, we quantified the frequency of biomarker disclosure reporting and the depth of descriptions provided. RESULTSOf 30 published trials using positron emission tomography or cerebrospinal fluid-based amyloid positivity as an eligibility criterion, only one mentioned disclosure, with no details on methods. DISCUSSIONPossible reasons for and implications of this information gap are discussed. Recommendations are provided for trialists considering biomarker screening as part of intervention trials focused on prodromal AD. HighlightsFew prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD) trial papers discuss biomarker disclosure.Disclosure has implications for participants, family members, and trial success.Disclosure must be consistently integrated and reported in prodromal AD trials.Best practice guidelines and training resources for disclosure are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available