4.3 Article

The Perceived Added Value of Bimonthly Injectable Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis According to West African Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Focus Group Study

Journal

AIDS PATIENT CARE AND STDS
Volume 37, Issue 10, Pages 480-488

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/apc.2023.0097

Keywords

HIV; prevention; PrEP; long-acting PrEP; injectable PrEP; MSM; West Africa; health behavior

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explored the perceived added value of bimonthly long-acting injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis (LAI-PrEP) as an HIV prevention tool among MSM in Burkina Faso, Cote d'Ivoire, Mali, and Togo. The results showed that LAI-PrEP was perceived to provide better protection against HIV and be more convenient compared to condoms and oral PrEP. However, concerns about needle fear, doubts about efficacy, potential side effects, and difficulties in ensuring timely injections were also identified. Increasing awareness about HIV and addressing discrimination based on sexual orientation remain crucial for HIV prevention.
Bimonthly long-acting injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis (LAI-PrEP) can become an important additional tool for HIV prevention among West African men who have sex with men (MSM). The objective was to explore the perceived added value of LAI-PrEP as an HIV prevention tool among MSM in Burkina Faso, Cote d'Ivoire, Mali, and Togo. We conducted eight focus group discussions among 62 HIV-negative MSM between April and May 2021. Participants were recruited via local community-based clinics. Data collection and analysis were guided by grounded theory and community-based participatory approaches. Participants were generally knowledgeable about HIV, and explained particular barriers for HIV prevention in their communities (e.g., denial of HIV). The added value of LAI-PrEP relative to condoms was similar to oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in terms of perceived advantages (e.g., improved sexual satisfaction) or disadvantages (e.g., no protection against other sexually transmitted infections). Compared with oral PrEP, LAI-PrEP was perceived to provide better protection against HIV and to be more convenient (e.g., no need to be mindful of intake and less risk for stigma). Concerns included fear of needles, doubts about efficacy, potential side effects, and difficulties for ensuring timely injections (e.g., when traveling abroad). The results demonstrate that injectable PrEP can be of particular interest to subgroups of West African MSM, although existing HIV prevention tools such as condoms and oral PrEP will remain valuable alongside of, or instead of, LAI-PrEP. Increasing awareness about HIV and tackling discrimination based on sexual orientation continue to be crucial factors to be addressed for HIV prevention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available