4.5 Article

Wheat and faba bean intercropping and cultivar impacts on morphology, disease, and yield

Journal

AGRONOMY JOURNAL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/agj2.21443

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modern agriculture heavily relies on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, but there is increasing pressure to find alternatives that can reduce these inputs. Intercropping, compared to monocultures, has the potential to reduce plant diseases and increase yield, resulting in reduced inputs and improved land use efficiency. However, identifying the crop and cultivar combinations that maximize these benefits is still a knowledge gap.
Modern agriculture relies heavily on synthetic fertilizer and pesticide inputs. Pressure is increasing to find alternatives that reduce such inputs. In comparison to monocultures, intercropping can reduce plant diseases and increase yield, thereby reducing inputs and maximizing land use efficiency. However, knowledge gaps remain regarding which crop and cultivar combinations maximize such benefits. Here, we grew two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and six faba bean (Vicia faba L.) cultivars in monoculture and intercrops over three seasons and measured plant morphology, disease prevalence, and yield. Wheat ear development was slower in monocultures but varied by cultivar and year. Wheat cultivars senesced faster in monocultures versus certain faba bean intercrop combinations. In both wheat cultivars, Fusarium spp. severity was higher, while yellow rust (Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici Westend.) was lower in monocultures versus intercropped plots but varied by year and faba bean cultivar. Chocolate spot (Botrytis fabae Sardina) in faba bean was higher in the cultivar 'Louhi' when grown in monoculture. Wheat cultivars yielded higher in monoculture versus intercropped plots. Faba bean yield was higher in monocultures but depended on wheat cultivar and year. Land equivalent ratios (LER) were not affected by interactions between cultivars or years but were always above one in intercropped plots. This indicates that it is always more efficient for yield to intercrop. Our results show that the benefits of intercropping with different wheat and faba bean cultivars varied, indicating that specific goals (i.e., disease suppression and yield) should be considered when selecting wheat-faba bean cultivar combinations. Intercropping can increase yield, reduce synthetic inputs, and suppress diseases compared to monocultures.Two wheat and six faba bean cultivars were grown in intercropped versus monoculture plots over 3 years.Impacts on plant morphology, disease severity, and yield quality and quantity were measured.Intercropping showed both positive and negative effects that varied by cultivar and year.Wheat-faba bean cultivars must be carefully chosen to maximize goals such as disease suppression and yield.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available