Agricultural intensity interacts with landscape arrangement in driving ecosystem services

Agricultural intensification has enhanced productivity but also led to enormous ecosystem service and biodiversity losses. Strategic spatial landscape design could counteract this trend, but, the scientific understanding of how ecosystem services respond to agricultural practices on one hand and land use composition and configuration on the other is not complete. This study aims to methodically explore how the effect of landscape layout settings on ecosystem services depends on the intensity of agricultural practices in their surroundings. Using the Netherlands as a case study, we used spatial regression models to analyze how agricultural management intensity affects the relationship between spatial composition and configuration metrics and ecosystem service indicators. We found that the effect of large shares of agricultural land use on species richness, pollination and landscape appreciation was increasingly negative with amplified intensity of agricultural practices. With higher agricultural intensity in the surroundings, the positive effects of well-connected natural vegetation on species richness were impaired. In contrast, the negative effects of high-intensity agriculture on pollination service were be buffered well through high shares of natural grassland vegetation. Water-quality related indicators were less affected by variation in spatial metrics and agricultural intensity. The main interactions between agricultural intensity and the spatial metrics were robust at varying scales. Our analysis suggests that both low-and high-intensity agriculture can have a place in future sustainable agricultural systems, provided they are integrated in the appropriate spatial layout. Explicitly addressing farming practices in connection to local spatial settings can improve both landscape planning and ecosystem service modelling.

Automated summary

This study examines the impact of agricultural management intensity on the relationship between spatial composition, configuration metrics, and ecosystem service indicators. The study finds that high-intensity agriculture has increasingly negative effects on species richness, pollination, and landscape appreciation, but these effects can be buffered through appropriate spatial layout. Water quality indicators are less affected by spatial metrics and agricultural intensity.