4.4 Article

African indigenous vegetables, gender, and the political economy of commercialization in Kenya

Journal

AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10460-023-10498-4

Keywords

African indigenous vegetables; Commercialization; Mixed methods; Feminist economics; Sub-Saharan Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of the commercialization of African indigenous vegetables on gender relations in labor, decision-making power, and access to resources. The findings reveal that while women experience economic empowerment through commercialization, it does not contribute to gender equality in terms of labor redistribution or land rights. Instead, it increases women's labor burden.
This study investigates the increased commercialization of African indigenous vegetables (AIV)-former subsistence crops such as African nightshade, cowpea leaves and amaranth species grown mainly by women-from a feminist economics perspective. The study aims to answer the following research question: How does AIV commercialization affect the gendered division of labor, women's participation in agricultural labor, their decision-making power, and their access to resources? We analyze commercialization's effects on gender relations in labor and decision-making power and also highlight women's agency. Based on a mixed method design and analyzing household-level panel data and qualitative focus groups from Kenya, we observe an economic empowerment of women that we relate to women's individual and collective strategies as well as their retention of control over AIV selling and profits. Yet, while we see economic empowerment of women through commercialization-how they broaden their scope of action and are empowered by generating revenue-that does not contribute to a redistribution of labor or land rights, which are key for gender equality, instead it increases women's labor burden.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available