4.7 Article

Modelling water/heat transfer and crop growth under film mulching condition in a seed-maize field

Journal

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
Volume 340, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109616

Keywords

Film mulching; Soil water and heat; Crop growth; Energy balance; Model simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The CropSMPAC model accurately simulates the dynamics of water, heat, and crop growth under plastic film mulching, making it a useful tool for irrigation water management and crop production.
Film mulching has been widely applied in arid and semi-arid areas around the world. Current models simulating the process of water, heat, and crop growth generally neglect or simplify the role of film mulching in energy balance and water/heat exchange. In this study, CropSMPAC model was established based on previously developed model (CropSPAC, the soil water/heat transfer and crop growth model), by incorporating the influence of film mulching on energy budget and partition, sensible and latent heat fluxes of the soil surface, precipitation interception, and crop growth. The CropSMPAC model was calibrated and validated using experimental data from a seed-maize field located in arid Northwest China for the years 2017, 2018, and 2019. The experimental setup included two mulching treatments, i.e., full film mulching (M1) and no mulching (M0) along with three irrigation treatments, i.e., full irrigation (WF), medium irrigation (WM, 70%WF), low irrigation (WL, 40%WF). The results demonstrated that the model performed well in simulating the dynamics of field water, heat, and crop growth under various film mulching and irrigation conditions. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficients for net radiation, soil heat flux, soil water storage (SWS), soil temperature (ST), leaf area index (LAI), aboveground dry biomass (ADB) were 0.57, 0.37, 0.79, 0.76, 0.95, 0.95, respectively. The relative errors for seed-maize yield, crop evapotranspiration (ET) were 9.38%, 9.10%, respectively. Furthermore, the model accurately reflected the differences in SWS and ST due to different mulching conditions (M1 and M0). The observed differences in SWS between M1 and M0 ranged from -30.6 to 32.9 mm, while the simulated differences ranged from -30.5 to 30.2 mm under various irrigation treatments. Similarly, the observed differences in ST between M1 and M0 were 1.8, 1.7, 1.0 and 1.4 degrees C at 10, 20, 40 and 80 cm soil depths, respectively, while the simulated differences were 2.3, 2.1, 1.7 and 0.8 degrees C under WF treatment. Additionally, the model effectively simulated the effects of film mulching on advancing the crop growth period and promoting LAI, ADB and yield. Overall, the model accurately captured the changes in energy fluxes, soil water, heat and crop growth caused by plastic film mulching, demonstrating that it is a useful tool for irrigation water management and crop production in crop land with film mulching.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available