4.6 Article

Quantitatively relating cosmic rays intensities from solar activity parameters based on structural equation modeling

Journal

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 638-648

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2023.02.044

Keywords

Cosmic rays; Sun dynamics; Modelling; Heliospheric Abundances; Photosphere; Solar wind

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neutron monitors on Earth's surface measure cosmic rays, which have a strong correlation with the number of sunspots. Other indices that affect the heliosphere dynamics and distortions in the Earth's geomagnetic field also show significant correlations. This study examines the relationships between various parameters of solar dynamics and cosmic ray intensity using Structural Equation Modeling.
Cosmic rays measured through neutron monitors on Earth's surface have a strong correlation with the number of sunspots on the solar photosphere. Other indices that affect the dynamics of the heliosphere and distortions in the Earth's geomagnetic field also exhibit significant correlations. Typically, studies focus on these indices individually or combine some into a smaller set of estimators. This study uses Structural Equation Modeling to examine relationships between a broad range of parameters of solar dynamics and cosmic ray intensity (measured by the Moscow neutron monitor) across several solar cycles from 1976 to present day. The study also classifies these indices into three distinct contributions: Photosphere, Solar Wind and Terrestrial Geomagnetic Field Distortions. Regression models were built for all solar cycles and the complete cosmic ray series from 1976 to the present, resulting in good estimators with calculated p-values below 0.05 (95% confidence). Relationships among all contributions were determined using their estimators. & COPY; 2023 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available