4.8 Review

Strategic Doping in Metal Halide Perovskites for Thermoelectrics

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202303774

Keywords

bulk doping; ionic defects; metal halide perovskites; surface; interface doping; thermoelectrics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal halide perovskites (MHPs) have unique thermal and electrical properties, making them promising in thermoelectric (TE) applications. However, their poor electrical conductivity hinders their practical use. This Minireview summarizes various doping strategies for MHPs and explores their impacts on thermal and electrical transport. A rational guideline is derived to enhance electrical doping in perovskite TEs.
Metal halide perovskites (MHPs) have not only shown unique merits of ultralow thermal conductivity compared to traditional inorganic thermoelectric (TE) materials, but also featured superior Seebeck effect to organic semiconductors, thereby affording great prospect in TE field. However, their severely poor electrical conductivity significantly hinders TE applications, which results from the restrained doping efficiency due to the limited accommodation capability of heterogeneous dopants and the heavy compensation from interior defects in MHPs. Realizing high-effectiveness electrical doping in MHPs becomes imperative yet remains extremely challenging. This Minireview is therefore intended to sort out the diversified doping strategies and highlight their underlying impacts on both thermal and electrical transportation in MHPs. These strategies are systematically classified into bulk and surface/interface doping as dictated by where the dopants are implemented while unravelling how they critically impact TE properties in distinctive means. A rational guideline is hence derived to strengthen electrical doping towards desirable perovskite TEs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available