4.7 Article

Automatic tower crane layout planning system for high-rise building construction using generative adversarial network

Journal

ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2023.102202

Keywords

Tower crane; Crane location; Generative adversarial network; Computer vision; Automatic design; Image-to-image translation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the increasing number of high-rise building projects, tower crane layout planning has become crucial. Current optimization approaches require manual data extraction, becoming more complex as projects scale. To alleviate the planning burden, an automatic TCLP system using a generative adversarial network is proposed, achieving robust and efficient results through parameter adjustment and data augmentation.
With the spring up of high-rise building projects, tower crane layout planning (TCLP) is increasingly crucial to avoid construction costs, safety issues, and productivity deficiencies. Current optimization approaches require manual data extraction and become more complex as projects scale growing. To further alleviate the planning burden, an automatic TCLP system is proposed, using a generative adversarial network (GAN) called CraneGAN. It generates tower crane layouts from drawing inputs, eliminating the need for manual information extraction. CraneGAN is trained on a high-quality dataset and evaluated based on its computational time and crane transportation time. By adjusting hyperparameters and applying data augmentation, CraneGAN achieves robust and efficient results compared to genetic algorithms (GA) and the exact analytics method. After validating through a numerical analysis for construction project, this proposed approach overcomes complexity limitations and streamlines the manual data extraction process to better facilitate layout planning decision-making.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available