☆ 4.5 Review

Double- versus single-balloon catheter for induction of labor: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA (2023)

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Balloon catheters versus vaginal prostaglandins for labour induction (CPI Collaborative): an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Madeleine N Jones et al.

LANCET (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Foley catheter versus cervical double balloon for labor induction: a prospective randomized study

Ido Solt et al.

Summary: CRDB catheter is more effective than Foley catheter in multiparas, associated with shorter time to delivery in both nulliparas and multiparas, and lower cesarean section rate in nulliparas.

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Value-based care in obstetrics: comparison between vaginal birth and caesarean section

Romulo Negrini et al.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (2021)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

The methodological quality of individual participant data meta-analysis on intervention effects: systematic review

Huan Wang et al.

Summary: This study assessed the methodological quality of individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis and found unsatisfactory compliance in assessing risk of bias, interpreting results, providing a list of excluded studies, establishing an a priori protocol, and other key aspects. Future IPD meta-analyses need to improve protocol establishment, literature search, bias assessment, and strategies for dealing with unavailable data.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Double Foley catheter for labor induction: An alternative method

Mehmet Obut et al.

Summary: The study found that there were differences in cervical score, vaginal delivery rate, and pain score among the DFC, FC, and Cook cervical ripening balloon groups, but maternal overall satisfaction was similar. The DFC had relatively lower pain scores and higher maternal satisfaction during labor induction, making it particularly suitable for low-resource countries.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS (2021)

Add to Collection

Review Obstetrics & Gynecology

Cervical ripening: Why we do what we do

Lisa D. Levine

SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

To share or not to share data: how valid are trials evaluating first-line ovulation induction for polycystic ovary syndrome?

Esmee M. Bordewijk et al.

HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Double- versus single-balloon catheters for labour induction and cervical ripening: a meta-analysis

Xiyao Liu et al.

BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH (2019)

Add to Collection

Review Obstetrics & Gynecology

Single versus Double-Balloon Transcervical Catheter for Labor Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Samantha X. de los Reyes et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Double-balloon catheter compared with single-balloon catheter for induction of labor with a scarred uterus

Yanping Xing et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY (2019)

Add to Collection

Review Obstetrics & Gynecology

Comparison of single-and double-balloon catheters for labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Raed Salim et al.

JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY (2018)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Exploring changes over time and characteristics associated with data retrieval across individual participant data meta-analyses: systematic review

Sarah J. Nevitt et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Exploring changes over time and characteristics associated with data retrieval across individual participant data meta-analyses: systematic review

Sarah J. Nevitt et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

30 mL Single- versus 80 mL double-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial

Kara K. Hoppe et al.

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae

Waleed Ali Sayed Ahmed et al.

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Single-Balloon Compared With Double-Balloon Catheters for Induction of Labor A Randomized Controlled Trial

Raed Salim et al.

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2011)

Add to Collection

Editorial Material Obstetrics & Gynecology

Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women With an Unfavorable Cervix: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Double and Single Balloon Catheters and PGE2 Gel EDITORIAL COMMENT

C. E. Pennell et al.

OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY (2010)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting

Richard D. Riley et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2010)

Add to Collection

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.